The agile method has established itself as an essential approach in software development. By focusing on collaboration, flexibility, and the continued delivery of value, it promises to improve product quality and customer satisfaction. However, many organizations are still struggling to take full advantage of this method. Often, the adoption of agility remains superficial: we set up a few rituals, we use new tools, but mentalities and real practices change little.
Training teams to the true essence of agility is therefore a key challenge, but it is a complex challenge. Indeed, it is not only a question of transmitting theoretical knowledge on a framework like Scrum or Kanban. Above all, it is necessary to develop new reflexes, new ways of thinking and working on a daily basis. How to design training courses that allow this in-depth appropriation? Recent advances in cognitive science and artificial intelligence provide powerful new answers to this question.
Many agility courses focus on the most visible and formal aspects of the method: the ceremonies to set up, the artifacts to be produced, the roles to be assigned... But in reality, becoming agile often involves challenging deep-rooted habits and assumptions about how to develop software:
To support such a transformation of mentalities, cognitive sciences show that top-down approaches where an expert delivers his knowledge have very limited effectiveness. Present slides explaining what a Burndown chart or the definition of”Done“will not be enough to change learners' representations. Worse, it could elicit rejection reactions if these new notions clash too head-on with their current beliefs.
It is therefore essential to get teams to experience the benefits of agility for themselves, by putting them in a position to solve concrete problems. For example, software development simulations with different constraints allow you to experience the limits of cascade operation and the benefits of iterative and incremental operation. Experienced situations thus bring out the key messages.
Rather than prescriptively formulating best practices, it is also important to let learners express their doubts and objections to agility. The trainer or the coaching system can then provide targeted feedback to gradually remove these obstacles. The process is gradual, by continuously readjusting the representations.
The adoption of the agile method in software development also requires the mastery of new tools and specific techniques:
Again, a simple theoretical presentation will not be enough to make teams autonomous. To enable the real acquisition of these skills, it is essential to rely on the principles of educational design from cognitive sciences:
A key point is to provide detailed and personalized feedback on learners' productions. Faced with an exercise, it is tempting to simply give the “official” correction. But to really make progress, nothing beats a specific feedback to each individual, pointing out their successes, areas for improvement, and giving targeted advice. It is this reflective practice that makes it possible to move from theoretical knowledge to grounded know-how.
Too often, training is seen as a break from daily work. You train intensively over a short period of time, then you go back to your job hoping to apply what you've learned. But without long-term support, the achievements remain fragile and old habits quickly return.
This is particularly true for agility, which is not just a sum of techniques but a daily state of mind. Its real appropriation is therefore played out over the long term, over the course of sprints and projects. It is by living concrete situations that we develop agile interpersonal skills: focus on value, adaptation to change, transparency, etc.
To support this journey, it is essential that training does not end at the classroom doors but extends into the daily workflow. Several complementary levers exist:
The objective is to bring agility to life on a daily basis, so that gestures become reflexes, and philosophy an evidence shared by all.
Deploying all these good training practices based on cognitive science may seem to require considerable resources. Produce content specific to the context, develop numerous exercises and personalized feedback, provide daily support... This seems to be reserved for large organizations with large training budgets.
But the recent development of teaching assistants based on artificial intelligence is radically changing the situation. Take the example of Didask: its educational AI makes it possible to industrialize the best training techniques, to make them accessible to all structures that want to adopt agility:
So, educational AI allows you to reconcile the best of both worlds. On the one hand, training content is rooted in reality and the field expertise specific to each organization. But on the other hand, these contents are highlighted and made really actionable thanks to the best teaching techniques from cognitive sciences. All without mobilizing excessive resources!
Training teams in the agile method on their software development projects is a strategic challenge for many organizations, but it is an arduous challenge. To truly transform mentalities and entrench new practices, it is not enough to conduct a traditional training program. It is necessary to design learning experiences that are based on the latest advances in cognitive sciences: deconstruction of presuppositions, frequent simulations, personalized feedback, long-term support...
Artificial intelligence, in particular educational assistants like the one offered by Didask, provides a pragmatic and powerful response to this challenge. It makes it possible to industrialize the creation of tailor-made and immersive training courses, without requiring considerable resources. With these new tools, the promise of a true agile transformation of development teams is more within reach than ever.
Prenez directement rendez-vous avec nos experts du eLearning pour une démo ou tout simplement davantage d'informations.
Cognitive sciences & pedagogy
Cognitive sciences & pedagogy
Cognitive sciences & pedagogy